![]() ![]() Item 8 designated the place for receipt of bids as: The IFB provided that sealed bids were due in original, with one copy, at the place specified in Item 8 by 11:00 AM local time on August 22, 2003. Weeks, the second low bidder, argues that the bid submitted by Great Lakes was late and should have been rejected because it did not qualify under any of the exceptions to the late bidding rules. DACW51-03-B-0013, issued for the Maintenance Dredging Shinnecock Inlet Interim Beach Nourishment Project. Army Corps of Engineers to accept the apparent low bid submitted by Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company under invitation for bids (IFB) No. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.Īgency reasonably accepted late bid where the paramount cause of the late receipt was affirmative misdirection by the agency and where consideration of the late bid did not compromise the integrity of the competitive procurement system. Army Corps of Engineers, for the agency.Įdward Goldstein, Esq., and Christine S. Hilleboe, Esq., Steptoe & Johnson LLP, for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company, an intervenor. Sullivan, Esq., Starfield & Payne, for the protester.ĭaniel C.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |